Whitaker v. Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Defendant: Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2021cv00808
Filed: February 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer filed by Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.. (Gross, Jamie) (Filed on 3/10/2021)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc. served on 2/17/2021, answer due 3/10/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/19/2021)
February 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brian Whitaker.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/3/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/16/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Brian Whitaker re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15521680.). Filed byBrian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 2/2/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitaker v. Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.
Represented By: Jamie Leigh Gross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?