Couch Distributing Company, Inc. v. Diageo Beer Company USA
Couch Distributing Company, Inc. |
Diageo Beer Company USA |
5:2021cv00842 |
February 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Beth Labson Freeman |
Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Couch Distributing Company, Inc.. Diageo Beer Company USA served on 2/11/2021, answer due 3/4/2021. (Welch, Patricia) (Filed on 3/31/2021) |
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Couch Distributing Company, Inc. re 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #1 Complaint, #5 Summons Issued (Welch, Patricia) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety as Summons Returned Executed. Re: #18 Certificate of Service filed by Couch Dist ributing Company, Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING #16 STIPULATION ON BRIEFING DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/18/2021.(blflc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2021) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Couch Distributing Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Welch, Patricia) (Filed on 3/17/2021) |
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSINGMENT. Motion Hearing as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss set for 9/2/2021 09:00 AM and Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/2/2021 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 8/26/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021) |
Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 3/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2021) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2021) |
Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Diageo Beer Company USA.. (Farkas, David) (Filed on 3/11/2021) |
Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Couch Distributing Company, Inc... (Welch, Patricia) (Filed on 3/11/2021) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RE MOTION HEARING: Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. #8 , having been filed on less than 35 days notice, see Civil L.R. 7-2, the motion hearing has been re-set for April 13, 2021, 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/11/2021. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Diageo Beer Company USA. Motion Hearing set for 4/6/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Responses due by 3/18/2021. Replies due by 3/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Levi W. Heath, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Farkas, David) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Diageo Beer Company USA NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Farkas, David) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Diageo Beer Company USA (Farkas, David) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Diageo Beer Company USA. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2021) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Welch, Patricia) (Filed on 2/8/2021) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/27/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/4/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2021) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/17/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Diageo Beer Company USA ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15526513.). Filed byCouch Distributing Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Welch, Patricia) (Filed on 2/2/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Couch Distributing Company, Inc. v. Diageo Beer Company USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Diageo Beer Company USA | |
Represented By: | David Brian Farkas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Couch Distributing Company, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Craig S. Ritchey |
Represented By: | Kent Jeffrey Schmidt |
Represented By: | Patricia Anne Welch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.