Wong v. Dawson et al
| Mou Un Wong |
| Christina Kamalam, Christina K. Dawson, Daniel Andrews, Alex Singarayan, Alex Royappa, Amol Sinha, Daniel Royappa and Christina K. Dawson doing business as Christina Dawson |
| 5:2021cv01006 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Edward J Davila |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Remark - Pursuant to an order remanding the case to your court, transmitted are: Certified original and one copy of this letter, Certified copy of docket entries, Certified copy of Remand Order to Superior Court. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021) Modified text on 3/15/2021 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7
SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 03/15/2021. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 6 (Text Only) CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/3/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/13/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Hon. Edward J. Davila. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mou Un Wong.. (Rothbard, Todd) (Filed on 2/10/2021) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/12/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 20CV371561. ( Filing fee of $402, Receipt # 54611018589). Filed byChristina Kamalam, Alex Singarayan, Daniel Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Evidence - 1, #2 Exhibits A - B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Filng Fee Receipt)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
