Whitaker v. Dean et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Rebello's Towing Services, Inc., Mona Louise Dean and Burt A. Dean |
| 5:2021cv01995 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Burt A. Dean, Mona Louise Dean, Rebello's Towing Services, Inc... (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Burt A. Dean, Mona Louise Dean, Rebello's Towing Services, Inc. re #13 Answer to Complaint (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byBurt A. Dean, Mona Louise Dean, Rebello's Towing Services, Inc.. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION EXTENDING MONA AND BURT DEAN'S DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST RESPONSIVE PLEADING filed by Burt A. Dean, Mona Louise Dean. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 5/3/2021) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Mona Louise Dean served on 4/22/2021, answer due 5/13/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 5/3/2021) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Burt A. Dean served on 4/7/2021, answer due 4/28/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/29/2021) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION EXTENDING REBELLO'S TOWING SERVICES, INC.'S DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST RESPONSIVE PLEADING filed by Rebello's Towing Services, Inc.. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 4/28/2021) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Rebello's Towing Services, Inc. served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brian Whitaker.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/24/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Burt A. Dean, Mona Louise Dean, Rebello's Towing Services, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/6/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Brian Whitaker re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15736371.). Filed byBrian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
