Mohammed v. Whitley
Plaintiff: Zainab Mohammed
Defendant: Honorable John E Whitley
Case Number: 5:2021cv03481
Filed: May 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #14 Stipulation Re: MTD Briefing Schedule. Defendant's reply now due 7/16/2021. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 7/8/2021. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2021)
July 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE MTD BRIEFING SCHEDULE filed by John E Whitley. (Scharf, James) (Filed on 7/8/2021)
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byZainab Mohammed. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration)(Royer, Dean) (Filed on 7/7/2021)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Declaration of JAMES A. SCHARF in Support of #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed byJohn E Whitley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - F)(Related document(s) #11 ) (Scharf, James) (Filed on 6/25/2021)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John E Whitley. Motion Hearing set for 8/11/2021 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Responses due by 7/9/2021. Replies due by 7/16/2021. (Scharf, James) (Filed on 6/25/2021)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John E Whitley.. (Scharf, James) (Filed on 6/25/2021)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. Defendant is requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 6/29/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2021)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zainab Mohammed.. (Royer, Dean) (Filed on 5/24/2021)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zainab Mohammed. John E Whitley served on 5/11/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. (Royer, Dean) (Filed on 5/12/2021)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Defendant on 05/11/2021, filed by Zainab Mohammed. (Royer, Dean) (Filed on 5/12/2021)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety as Summons Returned Executed as to USA. Re: #6 Affidavit of Service filed by Zaina b Mohammed (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to John E Whitley, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2 021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/24/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Royer, Dean) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John E Whitley ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15946448.). Filed byZainab Mohammed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet)(Royer, Dean) (Filed on 5/10/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mohammed v. Whitley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zainab Mohammed
Represented By: Dean Royer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honorable John E Whitley
Represented By: James A. Scharf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?