Henry v. Siotos et al
| Chris Henry |
| Corinda Siotos, Old Republic Title Company, McGovern Escrow Services, United States of America and John Siotos |
| 5:2021cv03637 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Siotos.. (Rice, Mark) (Filed on 7/2/2021) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant and Cross-Complainant John Siotos shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/6/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2021) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark John Rice on behalf of Defendant/Cross-Complainant John Siotos (Rice, Mark) (Filed on 6/18/2021) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byUnited States of America. (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 6/14/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United States of America.. (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 6/3/2021) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant United States of America shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/15/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2021) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re #1 Notice of Removal, (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/17/2021) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re #1 Notice of Removal, (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/17/2021) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION to Extend Response Deadline filed by United States of America. (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/17/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/28/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Civil Action from Marin County Superior Court. Their case number is CIV 2003161. (). Filed byUnited States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/14/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
