Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Cathrine R Lee |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2021cv04045 |
| May 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/1/2021. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Electronic receipt of acknowledgment of service by e-mail. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
| Wavier of Service of Summons, Complaint and Order Granting IFP emailed to SSA (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
Filing 5
Order by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 ***POSTED IN ERROR***Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/24/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/31/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 5/27/2021 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cathrine R Lee. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISION OF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY < (IFPP) ; NO PROCESS. Filed by Cathrine R Lee. Consent/Declination due by 6/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cathrine R Lee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
