Valencia-Torres v. Google LLC et al
| Maria Valencia-Torres |
| Google Payment Corp. and Google LLC |
| 5:2021cv04556 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 Case transferred in from District of Alabama Northern; Case Number 2:20-cv-01651. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 28
ORDER Transferring Case to MDL: ORDER of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring this case to the District of Northern California for inclusion in MDL 3001; record electronically transferred to Clerk of Court in District of Northern California. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 27
TEXT ORDER - The court conducted a telephone conference with counsel for the parties on April 14, 2021. As a result of the discussions during that conference, Defendants Motion to Lift Stay #23 and Supplemental Motion to Lift Stay #25 are DENIED. However, the Parties SHALL, on or before June 15, 2021, submit a Joint Report to the court providing an update, at which time the court will consider whether to lift the stay. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 4/15/2021. (KAM)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Telephone Conference held on 4/14/2021. A separate order ruling on the pending motions to lift stay will be issued. (KLL) |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #25 Supplemental MOTION Lift Stay re #23 MOTION Lift Stay , #23 MOTION Lift Stay filed by Maria Valencia-Torres. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit JPML Notice of Related Actions and Attachments, #2 Exhibit Complaint - N.D. Ohio, #3 Exhibit Complaint - D.N.M., #4 Exhibit Complaint - S.D. Miss., #5 Exhibit Complaint - M.D. Tenn.)(Ware, Dargan) |
| Filing 25 Supplemental MOTION Lift Stay re #23 MOTION Lift Stay by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. (Pewitt, James) |
|
Filing 24
TEXT ORDER - Before the court is Defendants Motion to Lift Stay #23 . The Motion #23 is SET for a telephone conference on Wednesday, April 14, 2021, at 12:30 P.M. Counsel are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 4/9/2021. (KAM)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION Lift Stay by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. (Pewitt, James) |
|
Filing 22
TEXT ORDER - Before the court is Plaintiff Maria Valencia-Torres Motion to Stay Proceedings. #21 . In that Motion, Plaintiff moves the court for an order staying this action for ninety (90) days, pending a ruling by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Plaintiffs Motion for Transfer of Actions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 for Centralized Pretrial Proceedings. For good cause shown, the Motion #21 is GRANTED and this case is STAYED for ninety (90) days. Furthermore, all outstanding motions are ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/31/2021. (KAM)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Maria Valencia-Torres. (Ware, Dargan) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3786459. (Pewitt, James) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3786460. (Pewitt, James) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3786461. (Pewitt, James) |
|
Filing 20
TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Defendants Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Teresa H. Michaud #17 , Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Bradford K. Newman #18 , and Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Alexander G. Davis #19 . The Motions [17, 18, 19] are CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. On or before Friday, February 26, 2021, attorneys Teresa H. Michaud, Bradford K. Newman, and Alexander G. Davis SHALL pay the PHV fees. Failure to do so will result in vacatur of the conditional grant of the motions. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/19/2021. (KAM)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Alexander G. Davis by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. (Pewitt, James) Modified on 2/18/2021 (KAM, ). |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Bradford K Newman by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. (Pewitt, James) Modified on 2/18/2021 (KAM, ). |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Teresa Michaud by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. (Pewitt, James) Modified on 2/18/2021 (KAM, ). |
|
Filing 16
TEXT ORDER - The court conducted a telephonic conference with counsel for the parties on February 10, 2021. As a result of discussions during that conference, Plaintiff SHALL file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss #11 on or before Wednesday, March 31, 2021. And, any reply to that response SHALL be filed by Defendant on or before Friday, April 30, 2021. Furthermore, on or before Wednesday, March 31, 2021, the parties SHALL file a Joint Report with the court indicating (1) any recent developments in the case and (2) whether scheduling a Rule 26(f) conference would be appropriate. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/11/2021. (KAM)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Telephone Conference held on 2/10/2021. The court will adopt the proposed deadlines presented by the parties. In addition, the parties shall file a joint status report by 3/31/2021 informing the court if the Rule 26 Report Meeting is necessary. (KLL) |
|
Filing 15
TEXT ORDER - The court has been informally contacted by the parties to reschedule the telephonic conference set for 12:30 P.M. on February 8, 2021 14 . For good cause shown, that telephonic conference is RESET to 12:30 P.M. on February 10, 2021. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/5/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER - Before the court is the Parties Stipulated Briefing Schedule Request #13 . To discuss that stipulation, the court SETS a telephone conference for 12:30 P.M. on February 8, 2021. Counsel are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/4/2021. (KAM)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Request for stipulated briefing schedule by Maria Valencia-Torres. filed by Maria Valencia-Torres (Ware, Dargan) |
|
Filing 12
INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/1/2021. (KAM)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. (Pewitt, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT - The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. The telephone conference set for December 14, 2020 is CANCELLED. Please use case number 2:20-cv-1651-RDP on all subsequent pleadings. (KEK) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to remind parties of consent telephone conference scheduled for 11:00 AM on Monday, 12/14/20; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, by 9:00 A.M. on Monday 12/14/20, the conference will be cancelled. (BST, ) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Maria Valencia-Torres. Google Payment Corp waiver sent on 12/1/2020, answer due 1/30/2021. (Ware, Dargan) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Google LLC. filed by Google LLC (Pewitt, James) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than January 8, 2021. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after January 8, 2021. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 10:00 a.m. on December 14, 2020. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/1/20. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: The parties' joint motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks an extension of time to respond to the complaint. (Doc. #4 ). Google, LLC, SHALL respond to the complaint by January 30, 2021, which will roughly coincide with the responsive pleading deadline for the other defendant, Google Payment Corp., should it waive service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/1/20. (MRR, )
|
| Reset Deadlines: Google LLC answer due 1/30/2021. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time Motion is RIPE 11/24/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Google LLC, Google Payment Corp., Maria Valencia-Torres (Pewitt, James) Modified on 11/24/2020 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Google LLC, Google Payment Corp. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (MEB2) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Google LLC, Google Payment Corp, filed by Maria Valencia-Torres.(MRR, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3698954 (B4601109216). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Google LLC, Google Payment Corp, filed by Maria Valencia-Torres.(MRR, ). (Ware, Dargan) Modified on 10/22/2020 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
