Hollis v. Allison et al
Ellis Clay Hollis |
B. Maub, J Arnold, Ron Davis, Dean Borders, T. R. Teixeira, Dr Steven Tharratt, Dr. L. Escobell, B. Dutton, Kathleen Allison, Dr. A. Pachynski, Joseph Diaz, Clark Kelso, Ron Broomfield, Governor Gavin Newsom, K. France, Clarence Cryer, M. Bloise and Ralph Diaz |
5:2021cv04974 |
June 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ellis Clay Hollis. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2021) Modified on 6/29/2021 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ellis Clay Hollis. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2021) Modified on 6/29/2021 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathleen Allison, J Arnold, M. Bloise, Dean Borders, Ron Broomfield, Clarence Cryer, Ron Davis, Joseph Diaz, Ralph Diaz, B. Dutton, L. Escobell, K. France, Clark Kelso, B. Maub, Gavin Newsom, A. Pachynski, T. R. Teixeira, Steven Tharratt. Filed byEllis Clay Hollis. Consent/Declination due by 7/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.