Barnert v. HP, Inc.
Radek Barnert |
HP, Inc. and HP, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as HP Computing and Printing Inc. |
5:2021cv05199 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Susan van Keulen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ANSWER to #34 Amended Complaint by HP, Inc.. (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 1/31/2022) |
Filing 34 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First) against HP, Inc.. Filed byRadek Barnert. (Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 1/17/2022) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Tyler Goodwin (Goodwin, Justin) (Filed on 1/13/2022) |
Filing 32 ORDER by Judge Susan van Keulen granting #22 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 1/17/2022. (svklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021) |
Filing 31 STATEMENT of Recent Decision in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d (2) filed by Radek Barnert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 11/17/2021) Modified on 11/18/2021 (jlg, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 30 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING 11/9/21 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.Initial Case Management Conference to be re-set if necessary after the Court's ruling on pending motion to dismiss. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
Filing 29 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 10/19/2021) |
Filing 28 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 10/19/2021) |
Filing 27 REPLY in Support (re #22 MOTION to Dismiss) filed by HP, Inc.. (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
Filing 26 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #22 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byRadek Barnert. (Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 9/27/2021) |
Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Susan van Keulen granting as modified by the Court #24 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss and Continue Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines. Responses due by 9/27/2021. Replies due by 10/18/2021. Motion to Dismiss hearing is taken off calendar and will be reset if necessary. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/9/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, - To be determined. (svklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2021) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to extend briefing schedule on HP's motion to dismiss and continue the Initial Case Management Conference to November 9, 2021 filed by Radek Barnert. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support of stipulation)(Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 9/10/2021) |
Filing 23 Request for Judicial Notice re #22 MOTION to Dismiss filed byHP, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Megan O'Neil ISO RJN with Exhibits 1-3, #2 Proposed Order Granting RJN)(Related document(s) #22 ) (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 8/30/2021) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by HP, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 10/12/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 9/13/2021. Replies due by 9/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 8/30/2021) |
Filing 21 Certificate of Interested Entities by HP, Inc. (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 8/27/2021) |
Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HP, Inc. (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 8/27/2021) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by David Ramirez-Galvez (Ramirez-Galvez, David) (Filed on 8/16/2021) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan O'Neill and David Ramirez-Galvez The attorney coming INTO the case should e-file a Notice of Appearance of Counsel under his or her own login. (O'Neill, Megan) (Filed on 8/16/2021) Modified on 8/16/2021 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Change of Address by Prachi V. Mehta (Mehta, Prachi) (Filed on 8/16/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. Re: #18 Notice of Appearance filed by HP, Inc. The attorney coming INTO the case should e-file a Notice of Appearance of Counsel under his or her own login. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2021) |
Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by HP, Inc... (Delgado, William) (Filed on 8/4/2021) |
Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Radek Barnert.. (Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 7/27/2021) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer or Respond to Complaint Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) filed by HP, Inc.. (Mehta, Prachi) (Filed on 7/26/2021) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew C. De Re (De Re, Matthew) (Filed on 7/21/2021) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Susan van Keulen granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice re Matthew C. De Re. (svklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2021) |
Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16200206.) filed by Radek Barnert. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(De Re, Matthew) (Filed on 7/21/2021) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/4/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2021) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr (Zimmerman, Thomas) (Filed on 7/20/2021) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Judge Susan van Keulen granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice re Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr. (svklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2021) |
Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16196766.) filed by Radek Barnert. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Zimmerman, Thomas) (Filed on 7/20/2021) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Radek Barnert. HP, Inc. served on 7/8/2021, answer due 7/29/2021. (Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to HP, Inc. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2021) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/20/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HP, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16148539.). Filed byRadek Barnert. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Javitch, Mark) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.