Slade v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Najee Slade
Defendant: Geodis Logistics, LLC and Geodis USA, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv05364
Filed: July 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Filing 18 STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF NAJEE SLADES CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC. (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 8/20/2021)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend Time To Respond To Initial Complaint by Judge Charles R. Breyer: Granting #16 Stipulation. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2021)
August 6, 2021 Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time To Respond To Initial Complaint filed by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
July 20, 2021 Filing 15 STIPULATION To Extend Time To Respond To Initial Complaint filed by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC. (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/20/2021)
July 15, 2021 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC of Judge Breyer Standing Orders (Chan, Garrick) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 15, 2021 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/22/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/29/2021 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 15, 2021 Filing 12 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 15, 2021 Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC Via U.S. Mail of Notice of Removal and Supporting Papers; Northern District ECF Information; Standing Order for All Judges (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Najee Slade.. (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/5/202 1. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
July 13, 2021 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/27/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
July 13, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC of Notice of Removal, Declaration of Rod Fliegel, Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certification of Interested Entities, Civil Cover Sheet, Notice of Appearance by Rod Fliegel, and Notice of Appearance by Garrick Chan (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
July 13, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Geodis Logistics, LLC, Geodis USA, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Ozburn-Hessey Holding Company, LLC, Other Affiliate OHH Acquisition LLC, Other Affiliate Geodis America, Inc. for Geodis Logistics, LLC. (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
July 13, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Rod M. Fliegel (Notice of Appearance by Garrick Y. Chan) (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
July 13, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Rod M. Fliegel (Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
July 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 21CV382877. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16172850). Filed byGeodis USA, LLC, Geodis Logistics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rod M. Fliegel in Support of Removal, #2 Exhibit A-E to Fliegel Declaration, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fliegel, Rod) (Filed on 7/13/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slade v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Najee Slade
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: David Keledjian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geodis Logistics, LLC
Represented By: Rod M. Fliegel
Represented By: Garrick Y. Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geodis USA, LLC
Represented By: Rod M. Fliegel
Represented By: Garrick Y. Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?