Siegel v. Ardelyx, Inc. et al
| Jeffrey Siegel |
| Ardelyx, Inc., Mike Raab and Justin Renz |
| Chad Bryant and Richard Bryant |
| 5:2021cv06228 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 CERTIFICATE of Counsel of Kristen O'Connor by Brett M. Middleton on behalf of Chad Bryant, Richard Bryant (Middleton, Brett) (Filed on 9/28/2021) |
| Filing 24 CERTIFICATE of Counsel of Frank J. Johnson by Brett M. Middleton on behalf of Chad Bryant, Richard Bryant (Middleton, Brett) (Filed on 9/28/2021) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Counsel by Brett M. Middleton on behalf of Chad Bryant, Richard Bryant (Middleton, Brett) (Filed on 9/28/2021) |
| Filing 22 Certificate of Interested Entities by Chad Bryant, Richard Bryant (Middleton, Brett) (Filed on 9/28/2021) |
| Filing 21 Declaration of Brett M. Middleton in Support of #20 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed byChad Bryant, Richard Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Related document(s) #20 ) (Middleton, Brett) (Filed on 9/28/2021) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Motion and MOTION of the Bryant Brothers for Consolidation, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff's, and Approval of Selection of Lead Counsel. filed by Chad Bryant, Richard Bryant. Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2022 at 9:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 10/12/2021. Replies due by 10/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Middleton, Brett) (Filed on 9/28/2021) Modified on 9/29/2021 (jlgS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 19
Order Granting #18 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Continuing Case Management Conference Deadlines. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 09/03/2021. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time To Respond To Complaint And Continuing Case Management Conference Deadlines filed by Ardelyx, Inc., Mike Raab, Justin Renz. (Rawlinson, Matthew) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 17 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Ardelyx, Inc., Mike Raab, Justin Renz (Rawlinson, Matthew) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ardelyx, Inc., Mike Raab, Justin Renz (Rawlinson, Matthew) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Robert Gherardi (Gherardi, Daniel) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie Marilyn Blunschi (Blunschi, Melanie) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Rawlinson (Rawlinson, Matthew) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jeffrey Siegel. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jeffrey Siegel. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jeffrey Siegel. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #7 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice for J. Alexander Hood II, Counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/13/2021. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2021)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #6 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Jeremy A. Lieberman, Counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/13/2021. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2021)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16281143.) filed by Jeffrey Siegel. (Hood, J) (Filed on 8/13/2021) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16281025.) filed by Jeffrey Siegel. (Lieberman, Jeremy) (Filed on 8/13/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ardelyx, Inc., Mike Raab, Justin Renz. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Edward J. Davila. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ardelyx, Inc., Mike Raab, Justin Renz ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16276010.). Filed byJeffrey Siegel. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Schedule A, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
