Nghiem v. Santa Clara University et al
| Peter P. Nghiem and Peter P Nghiem |
| Santa Clara University, Nam Ling, Grace Ling and Jeremy Kemp |
| 5:2021cv06872 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #12 Ex Parte Application to Change Due Date for Filing Amended Complaint to October 25, 2021, under Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(5). Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
Ex Parte Application re #10 Amended Complaint, #11 Notice of Change of Address FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by phung P nghiemphu. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(nghiemphu, phung) (Filed on 10/25/2021)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Change of Address by phung P nghiemphu Peter P. Nghiem (nghiemphu, phung) (Filed on 10/25/2021)
|
|
Filing 10
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed byphung P nghiemphu. (nghiemphu, phung) (Filed on 10/25/2021) Modified on 10/25/2021 (bns, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and screening the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Re: ECF #1 , #2 . The Court GRANTS leave to amend by 10/22/2021. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Representing Yourself Before This Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by phung P nghiemphu.. (nghiemphu, phung) (Filed on 9/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/1/202 1. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/8/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Peter P. Nghiem. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Peter P. Nghiem. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Jeremy Kemp, Grace Ling, Nam Ling, Santa Clara University. Filed byPeter P. Nghiem. Consent/Declination due by 9/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
