Sandeep Roy Chauhan v. Google Inc.
Plaintiff: Sandeep Roy Chauhan
Defendant: Google LLC
Case Number: 5:2021cv08948
Filed: November 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia K DeMarchi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re #14 Prohibition on Improper Ex Parte Communications with the Court; ORDER re Plaintiff's Request to Seal. Clerk directed to seal Dkt. Nos. [13-6] and [13-7]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 1/4/2022. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 4, 2022 Filing 14 Email from plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan requesting sealing. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2022) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 3, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION TO PRODUCE Decedent's Google Account Contents by Sandeep Roy Chauhan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F)(Chauhan, Sandeep) (Filed on 1/3/2022) Modified on 1/3/2022 (wsn, COURT STAFF).
January 1, 2022 Filing 12 Proposed Order re #13 MOTION TO PRODUCE Decedent's Google Account Contents by Sandeep Roy Chauhan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Chauhan, Sandeep) (Filed on 1/1/2022) Modified on 1/3/2022 (wsn, COURT STAFF).
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RELATING CASES; ORDER granting application to proceed in forma pauperis in Case no. 21-cv-09201-VKD. Case Nos. 5:21-cv-08948-VKD and 5:21-cv-09201-VKD are related. No reassignments needed at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 12/2/2021. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/3/2021: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lmh, COURT STAFF).
December 1, 2021 Prepared USM packet and notified SJ office for service re #10 Order. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2021) Modified on 12/1/2021 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #3 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 11/23/2021. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2021: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lmh, COURT STAFF).
November 22, 2021 Filing 9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/15/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/22/2022 at 1:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 22, 2021 Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:21-cv-08775. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: INTER-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim transferring case to Northern District of California. (see document for details). Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (hr)
November 9, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
November 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
November 9, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
November 7, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan. (car)
November 7, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan, (car)
November 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Google Inc. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandeep Roy Chauhan v. Google Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandeep Roy Chauhan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?