Parshall v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
James Parshall |
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano, Michael J. Sophie, Kimberly Y. Chainey, Rajiv Ramaswami, Ihab S. Tarazi, Timothy S. Jenks, Yanbing Li and Sheri L. Savage |
5:2022cv00055 |
January 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Susan van Keulen |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Parshall (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 2/3/2022) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/3/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2022) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/29/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2022 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2022) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano, Kimberly Y. Chainey, Timothy S. Jenks, Yanbing Li, NeoPhotonics Corporation, Rajiv Ramaswami, Sheri L. Savage, Michael J. Sophie, Ihab S. Tarazi. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2022) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/19/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2022) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by James Parshall identifying Corporate Parent NeoPhotonics Corporation, Other Affiliate Michael J. Sophie, Other Affiliate James Parshall, Other Affiliate WeissLaw LLP, Other Affiliate Timothy S. Jenks, Other Affiliate Yanbing Li, Other Affiliate Bandel L. Carano, Other Affiliate Rajiv Ramaswami, Other Affiliate Ihab S. Tarazi, Other Affiliate Sheri L. Savage, Other Affiliate Kimberly Y. Chainey, Other Affiliate Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., Other Affiliate Charles J. Abbe for James Parshall. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 1/5/2022) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Defendants List for Issuance of Summons)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 1/5/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano, Kimberly Y. Chainey, Timothy S. Jenks, Yanbing Li, NeoPhotonics Corporation, Rajiv Ramaswami, Sheri L. Savage, Michael J. Sophie, Ihab S. Tarazi ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16774151.). Filed byJames Parshall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Parshall Civil Cover Sheet)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 1/5/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.