Monet v. Tesla, Inc.
Plaintiff: Derrick Monet
Defendant: Tesla, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv00681
Filed: February 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Edward J Davila
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Granted Admission Pro Hac Vice as to Donald Slavik. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on March 11, 2022. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
March 7, 2022 Filing 22 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16966759.) filed by Derrick Monet. (Slavik, Donald) (Filed on 3/7/2022)
February 25, 2022 Filing 21 REPLY To Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (re #10 MOTION to Remand ) filed by Derrick Monet. (Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 2/25/2022) Modified on 2/28/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF).
February 25, 2022 Filing 20 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/28/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/18/2022. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2022)
February 24, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE by Derrick Monet re #10 MOTION to Remand (Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 2/24/2022)
February 22, 2022 Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 MOTION to Remand ) filed byTesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kliebenstein, Neil) (Filed on 2/22/2022)
February 17, 2022 Filing 17 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Derrick Monet. (Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 2/17/2022)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2022)
February 14, 2022 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2022)
February 14, 2022 Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tesla, Inc... (Kliebenstein, Neil) (Filed on 2/14/2022)
February 9, 2022 Filing 13 Declaration of ELISE R. SANGUINETTI in Support of #10 MOTION to Remand CORRECTION OF DOCKET # [10-1] filed byDerrick Monet. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-1 CORRECTION OF DOCKET # [10-3], #3 Exhibit B-2 CORRECTION OF DOCKET # [10-3 part 2], #4 Exhibit C CORRECTION OF DOCKET # [10-4], #5 Exhibit D CORRECTION OF DOCKET # [10-5], #6 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 2/9/2022)
February 7, 2022 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. All parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/14/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2022)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING Application for Admission of Attorney Thomas Branigan Pro Hac Vice representing Tesla, Inc. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2022)
February 7, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION to Remand filed by Derrick Monet. Motion Hearing set for 3/30/2022 01:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Responses due by 2/22/2022. Replies due by 3/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Elise R. Sanguinetti In Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit Exibit A to Elise R. Sanguinetti Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Elise R. Sanguinetti Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Elise R. Sanguinetti Declaration, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D to Elise R. Sanguinetti Declaration, #6 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 2/7/2022)
February 7, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Thomas Branigan ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16878381.) filed by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Branigan, Thomas) (Filed on 2/7/2022)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #7 Application for Admission of Attorney Thomas N. Lurie Pro Hac Vice representing Tesla, Inc. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2022)
February 4, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by Thomas N. Lurie ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16873564.) filed by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Lurie, Thomas) (Filed on 2/4/2022)
February 3, 2022 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/27/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/4/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2022)
February 3, 2022 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/17/2022. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2022)
February 3, 2022 #Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Elise Rochelle Sanguinetti. The docket shows a different address from what is appearing on the document (dkt. #: 1 Notice of Rem oval, filed by Tesla, Inc.). Please update your personal profile on ECF. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2022)
February 3, 2022 Answer to Removal Complaint filed in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara on February 1, 2022 by Tesla, Inc.. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2022)
February 2, 2022 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Tesla, Inc. (Corrected). (Kliebenstein, Neil) (Filed on 2/2/2022)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tesla, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Kliebenstein, Neil) (Filed on 2/2/2022)
February 2, 2022 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tesla, Inc. (Kliebenstein, Neil) (Filed on 2/2/2022)
February 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court with jury demand. Their case number is 21CV391421. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-16863915). Filed by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kliebenstein, Neil) (Filed on 2/2/2022) Modified on 2/3/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF).
February 2, 2022 #Electronic filing error. Incorrect Revision of Civil Cover Sheet used [err201]. Current Revision is JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 10/20). No judge assignment will be made until the d ocument is e-filed. Please complete correct Civil Cover Sheet and e-file an Amended Civil Cover Sheet only. Event is located at: Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet.]Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Tesla, Inc. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monet v. Tesla, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Monet
Represented By: Elise Rochelle Sanguinetti
Represented By: Donald Harlan Slavik
Represented By: Jamie Greer Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tesla, Inc.
Represented By: Neil M. Kliebenstein
Represented By: Thomas P Branigan
Represented By: Thomas Lurie, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?