Malberg v. McCracken et al
Martin Malberg |
Judge Joanne McCracken, Judge Christine Garcia-Sen, Rob Bonta and State of California |
5:2022cv01713 |
March 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Edward J Davila |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Joanne McCracken. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Rob Bonta. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Christine Garcia-Sen. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/16/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/6/2022. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Previous Initial Case Management Order with ADA Deadlines and the Court's Standing Order also mailed to pro se Plaintiff |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by CLERK on 3/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Martin Malberg. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2022) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/8/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/15/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Injunction (No Process) against Rob Bonta, Christine Garcia-Sen, Joanne McCracken, State of California (Filing fee paid $ 402. Receipt # 54611018805). Filed by Martin Malberg. Consent/Declination due by 3/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit-1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2022) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/17/2022: #3 Filing Fee Receipt) (bw, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.