Ali v. Tata Consultancy
Plaintiff: Syed Nazim Ali
Defendant: Tata Consultancy
Case Number: 5:2022cv02371
Filed: April 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia K DeMarchi
Referring Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2022 Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Motion Hearing as to #10 MOTION to Remand reset to 8/25/2022 09:00 AM and Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2022 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 8/18/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 16, 2022 Filing 21 OBJECTIONS to re New Evidence Submitted by Plaintiff in Support of His Reply Memorandum re #20 Response ( Non Motion ) by Tata Consultancy. (Smith, Philip) (Filed on 5/16/2022) Modified on 5/17/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF).
May 12, 2022 Filing 20 RESPONSE by Syed Nazim Ali. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ALI Declaration ISO Reply, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A-E, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service POS Reply)(Ali, Syed) (Filed on 5/12/2022)
May 10, 2022 Filing 19 Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to State Court re #10 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed byTata Consultancy. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Uma Vajjala in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration of Gonzalo Morales in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Smith, Philip) (Filed on 5/10/2022) Modified on 5/11/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF).
April 29, 2022 Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2022 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 4/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 27, 2022 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 27, 2022 Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tata Consultancy.. (Sevilla, Angelito) (Filed on 4/27/2022)
April 27, 2022 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tata Consultancy (Sevilla, Angelito) (Filed on 4/27/2022)
April 26, 2022 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Syed Nazim Ali (Ali, Syed) (Filed on 4/26/2022)
April 26, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Syed Nazim Ali (Ali, Syed) (Filed on 4/26/2022)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #6 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. (vkdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 26, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION TO REMAND (re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ) filed by Syed Nazim Ali. (Attachments: #1 Declaration 4.26 Plaintiff Decl Supporting Oppsition Def Removal of Case to Federal Court, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A-C)(Ali, Syed) (Filed on 4/26/2022) Modified on 4/27/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF). Opposition due 5/10/22. Reply due 5/17/22. Modified on 5/12/2022 (tsh, COURT STAFF).
April 25, 2022 Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Syed Nazim Ali. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022)
April 25, 2022 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Syed Nazim Ali (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022)
April 25, 2022 Filing 7 (Proposed) Order Granting re #6 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing by Syed Nazim Ali. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022)
April 25, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Syed Nazim Ali. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022)
April 20, 2022 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tata Consultancy identifying Corporate Parent TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED for Tata Consultancy. (Sevilla, Angelito) (Filed on 4/20/2022)
April 19, 2022 #Electronic filing error. Filer did not add all interested parties when prompted. Re-file this document in its entirety and when prompted, enter all affiliates or corporate parents . Re: #4 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Tata Consultancy (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2022)
April 19, 2022 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tata Consultancy (Sevilla, Angelito) (Filed on 4/19/2022)
April 18, 2022 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/12/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/19/2022 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 18, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/2/2022. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2022)
April 15, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332 AND 1441 (DIVERSITY) from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV395482. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17092410). Filed byTata Consultancy. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ashok Seetharaman in Support of Defendant Tata Consultancy Services Limited's Removal of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to U.S.C. sections 1332 and 1441 (Diversity), #2 Declaration of Philip J. Smith in Support of Defendant Tata Consultancy Services Limited's Removal of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to U.S.C. sections 1332 and 1441 (Diversity), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sevilla, Angelito) (Filed on 4/15/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ali v. Tata Consultancy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Syed Nazim Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tata Consultancy
Represented By: Angelito Remo Sevilla
Represented By: Philip James Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?