Doherty v. Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC
| Matthew Doherty |
| Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC |
| 5:2022cv02822 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
REPLY (re #14 Amended MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byAsurion UBIF Franchise, LLC. (Antonucci, Barbara) (Filed on 6/9/2022)
|
|
Filing 15
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #14 Amended MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byMatthew Doherty. (Hirsch, Paul) (Filed on 6/2/2022)
|
|
Filing 14
Amended MOTION to Dismiss filed by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 12/15/2022 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 6/2/2022. Replies due by 6/9/2022. (Norimoto, Nathan) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
|
|
Filing 13
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew Doherty.. (Hirsch, Paul) (Filed on 5/25/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Matthew Doherty. (Hirsch, Paul) (Filed on 5/25/2022)
|
|
Filing 11
Certificate of Interested Entities by Matthew Doherty (Hirsch, Paul) (Filed on 5/25/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2022 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before the Hon. Edward J. Davila. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2022. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 5/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC.. (Norimoto, Nathan) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss filed by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 6/28/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 6/2/2022. Replies due by 6/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Norimoto, Nathan) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, 3 Case Assigned by Intake,, #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, (Antonucci, Barbara) (Filed on 5/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/9/2022 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/16/2022 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2022)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/27/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2022)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. ANDREA RAWLINS- The docket shows a different address and last name from what is appearing on the document. Please update your personal profile on ECF. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2022)
|
|
Filing 2
Certificate of Interested Entities by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Asurion Group, Inc., Other Affiliate Asurion, LLC, Other Affiliate Lonestar Intermediate Holdings, LLC, Other Affiliate Lonestar Intermediate Super Holdings, LLC for Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Norimoto, Nathan) (Filed on 5/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV395674. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17170730). Filed by Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-8 to Removal, #3 Declaration of K. Gaul, #4 Declaration of T. Allensworth, #5 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice)(Norimoto, Nathan) (Filed on 5/12/2022) Modified on 5/13/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doherty v. Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Doherty | |
| Represented By: | Donald Aaron Brock |
| Represented By: | Paul Henry Hirsch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Asurion UBIF Franchise, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Norimoto |
| Represented By: | Barbara I. Antonucci |
| Represented By: | Andrea Nicole deKoning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
