Jaiyeola v. Rivian
Plaintiff: Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola
Defendant: Rivian
Case Number: 5:2022cv03982
Filed: July 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply filed by Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. (Jaiyeola, Ganiyu) (Filed on 9/2/2022)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPLY (re #4 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Lack of Proper Venue Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) ) filed byRivian. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Arnett, Ashley) (Filed on 8/30/2022)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #4 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Lack of Proper Venue Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) ) filed by Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Declaration Exhibit D)(Jaiyeola, Ganiyu) (Filed on 8/23/2022) Modified on 8/24/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF).
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADMONISHING PLAINTIFF FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH STANDING ORDER; ADVISING PLAINTIFF REGARDING #12 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, LLC'S MOTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/16/2022. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #4 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Lack of Proper Venue Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) ) filed byGaniyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Jaiyeola, Ganiyu) (Filed on 8/16/2022)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT.Motion Hearing as to #4 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Lack of Proper Venue Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) reset for 12/8/2022 09:00 AM and Initial Case Management Conference reset for 12/8/2022 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 1, 5th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 12/1/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed Clerk on 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022)
August 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola.. (Jaiyeola, Ganiyu) (Filed on 8/7/2022)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff is requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/9/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the docket.
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Rivian (Arnett, Ashley) (Filed on 8/2/2022)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rivian.. (Arnett, Ashley) (Filed on 8/2/2022)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Lack of Proper Venue Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) filed by Rivian. Motion Hearing set for 9/14/2022 01:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Responses due by 8/16/2022. Replies due by 8/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Declaration, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Proposed Order, #8 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Arnett, Ashley) (Filed on 8/2/2022) Modified on 8/3/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF).
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/28/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rivian. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rivian (Filing Fee $ 402, Receipt Number 54611018861). Filed by Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. Consent/Declination due by 7/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaiyeola v. Rivian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rivian
Represented By: Ashley Nicole Arnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?