Pectol v. Pectol
Plaintiff: Michael Pectol
Defendant: Brent Pectol
Case Number: 5:2022cv04604
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2022 Filing 8 Mail sent to Michael Pectol returned as undeliverable re #5 Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination,, #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases,. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2022)
August 24, 2022 Filing 7 SUA SPONTE Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Case 5:22-cv-04604 NC with 4:21-cv-09489 HSG. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 8/24/2022. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and SCREENING Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 24, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff is requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/7/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 10, 2022 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/2/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/9/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 10, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Pectol. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022)
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE by Michael Pectol (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022)
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brent Pectol. Filed byMichael Pectol. Consent/Declination due by 8/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part, #2 Exhibit Part 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pectol v. Pectol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Pectol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brent Pectol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?