Shruhan v. Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Donald K. Shruhan
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv05498
Filed: September 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Edward J Davila
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting #15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Stephanie Verdoia. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/23/2022. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Granting #14 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Jessica Thompson. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/23/2022. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple Inc.. Filed byDonald K. Shruhan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Redlined Amended Complaint))(Thompson, Jessica) (Filed on 11/16/2022)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17734081.) filed by Donald K. Shruhan. (Verdoia, Stephanie) (Filed on 11/16/2022)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17734058.) filed by Donald K. Shruhan. (Thompson, Jessica) (Filed on 11/16/2022)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Request for Judicial Notice re #12 MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint filed byApple Inc.. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 11/2/2022)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Apple Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 4/6/2023 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 11/16/2022. Replies due by 11/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Annie Vadillo in Support of Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike)(Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 11/2/2022)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/30/2022. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2022)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 10/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2022)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2022)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Apple Inc... (Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 10/3/2022)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/22/20 22. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/28/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2022)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apple Inc. re 5 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 9/29/2022)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/12/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2022)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apple Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #3 Civil Cover Sheet (Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 9/28/2022)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Apple Inc. . (Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 9/27/2022)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Apple Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal (Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 9/27/2022)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is T22-1970. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17572076). Filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perry, Jessica) (Filed on 9/27/2022)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Nature of suit is different then docket. Please refile corrected civil cover sheet. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-f iled. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetThis filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Apple Inc. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shruhan v. Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald K. Shruhan
Represented By: Cecilia Nora Brennan
Represented By: Jessica Thompson
Represented By: Stephanie Verdoia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Represented By: Jessica Perry
Represented By: Anjali Priya Vadillo
Represented By: Jillian V. Kaltner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?