Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Whitman
| Agilent Technologies, Inc. |
| Laura Whitman |
| 5:2022cv06970 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 EXHIBITS re #10 Declaration in Support, Replacement Exhibit I filed byAgilent Technologies, Inc.. (Related document(s) #10 ) (Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 12 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Agilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Forbes iso Admin. Motion to Seal, #2 Proposed Order, #3 LeMond Exhibit A (Sealed), #4 LeMond Exhibit B (Sealed), #5 LeMond Exhibit C (Sealed), #6 LeMond Exhibit E (Sealed))(Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 11 Declaration of Peter Chassman in Support of #8 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, and Expedited Discovery filed byAgilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Caroline Tsou in Support of #8 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, and Expedited Discovery filed byAgilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H, #2 Exhibit I, #3 Exhibit J, #4 Exhibit K)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 9 Declaration of Catherine LeMond in Support of #8 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, and Expedited Discovery filed byAgilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Public), #2 Exhibit B (Public), #3 Exhibit C (Public), #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E (Public), #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 8 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, and Expedited Discovery filed by Agilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service re Notice to Defendant, #3 Proposed Order)(Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Agilent Technologies, Inc... (Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/31/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2023 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17708245.) filed by Agilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Forbes, Michael) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17708091.) filed by Agilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Chassman, Peter) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Agilent Technologies, Inc. Corrected Civil Cover Sheet. (Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/22/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Demand for Jury Trial against Laura Whitman (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17706483.). Filed by Agilent Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chin, May-tak) (Filed on 11/7/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Whitman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Agilent Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael John Forbes |
| Represented By: | Peter John Chassman |
| Represented By: | May-tak Chin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Laura Whitman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
