Libman v. Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff: Elliot Libman
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv07069
Filed: November 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Edward J Davila
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy S. Heath (Heath, Amy) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 29, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Elizabeth Cahoy (Cahoy, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 29, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION Enlarging Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Apple, Inc.. (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 29, 2022 Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Apple, Inc. (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 29, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Johnson Henn (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 23, 2022 Filing 10 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/9/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/24/2023. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 18, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elliot Libman. Apple, Inc. served on 11/17/2022, answer due 12/8/2022. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 11/18/2022)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case, except for Discovery Purposes. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2022)
November 15, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2022)
November 15, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2022)
November 15, 2022 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 2/1/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/8/2023 10:00 AM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2022) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2022: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (mcl, COURT STAFF).
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Elliot Libman.. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 11/14/2022)
November 14, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/28/2022. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2022)
November 10, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Fisher, L.) (Filed on 11/10/2022)
November 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17718652.). Filed byElliot Libman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fisher, L.) (Filed on 11/10/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Libman v. Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elliot Libman
Represented By: L. Timothy Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Represented By: Kathryn Elizabeth Cahoy
Represented By: Emily Johnson Henn
Represented By: Amy S. Heath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?