Stanford Health Care v. Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan, et al
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation and Stanford Health Care
Defendant: THE CHEFS WAREHOUSE, INC., WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, a California entity, TRUSTMARK HEALTH BENEFITS, a Delaware entity, Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan and Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv07737
Filed: December 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Edward J Davila
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byStanford Health Care. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 2/3/2023)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stanford Health Care (Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 1/19/2023)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stanford Health Care (Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 1/19/2023)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan, Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2023 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 2/2/2023. Replies due by 2/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Lloyd Sarrel in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1)(Katsuyama, Neil) (Filed on 1/19/2023) Modified on 1/20/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil Katsuyama (Katsuyama, Neil) (Filed on 1/19/2023)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/23/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/10/2023. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2022)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 12/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2022)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Barbara V. Lam (Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 12/22/2022)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Stanford Health Care identifying Corporate Parent STANFORD HEALH CARE for Stanford Health Care. (Byars, Venetia) (Filed on 12/22/2022)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2022)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Stanford Health Care.. (Byars, Venetia) (Filed on 12/21/2022)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CORRECTED COMPLAINT against Stanford Health Care. Filed by Stanford Health Care. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 12/19/2022) Modified on 12/20/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF).
December 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan, Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2022)
December 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/8/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2022)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/23/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Stanford Health Care . (Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #1 Proposed Summons, filed by Stanford Health Care.Re-file Proposed Summons in a stand along docket entry using the event "Proposed Summons." (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used. Please use most current version (10/2020) found on our website www.cand.uscourts.gov. No judge assignment will be made u ntil the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc., Stanford Health Care (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan, Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17795400.). Filed by Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation, Trustmark Health Benefits, a Delaware entity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lam, Barbara) (Filed on 12/7/2022) Modified on 12/11/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanford Health Care v. Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation
Represented By: Barbara V. Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care
Represented By: Venetia Ida-Jane Byars, Esq.
Represented By: Joy Stephenson-Laws
Represented By: Karlene Jasmine Rogers-Aberman
Represented By: Barbara V. Lam
Represented By: David Frank Mastan
Represented By: Richard Alan Lovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE CHEFS WAREHOUSE, INC., WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, a California entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRUSTMARK HEALTH BENEFITS, a Delaware entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan
Represented By: Neil Katsuyama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trustmark Health Benefits, Inc.
Represented By: Neil Katsuyama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?