DeBert v. Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department et al
| Charlene DeBert |
| Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department, Meggan Stringent and Deputies DOES 1-20 |
| 5:2022cv09011 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Charlene DeBert.. (DeBert, Charlene) (Filed on 2/7/2023) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED Administrative Motion and Proposed Order to Change Deadline for Filing First Amended Complaint (amend mistake extend time) filed by Charlene DeBert. (DeBert, Charlene) (Filed on 2/6/2023) Modified on 2/7/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7
ORDER EXTENDING Time and Warning Plaintiff Debert of Consequences for Failure to File Amended Complaint. Re: ECF #6 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] Please re-file the Consent/Declination Form Using the Proper Event Which Can be Located Under: Civil > Other Documents > Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file ONLY Re: #6 -1 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge filed by Charlene DeBert. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2023) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #4 Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination,, #1 Complaint, 22cv09011 filed by Charlene DeBert. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Magistrate consent)(DeBert, Charlene) (Filed on 2/5/2023) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and screening complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Re: ECF #1 , #2 . The Court grants Debert leave to amend by 2/6/2023. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2023)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff is requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 1/5/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Parti cipants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/15/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/22/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charlene DeBert. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deputies DOES 1-20, Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department, Meggan Stringent with jury demand (NO PROCESS). Filed by Charlene DeBert. Consent/Declination due by 1/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
