Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. v. CloudFlare, Inc.
| Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. |
| CloudFlare, Inc. |
| 5:2022mc80287 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Tracy O. Appleton, #2 Check Point's Notice of Motion to Quash Subpoena; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Ehrlich, Miles) (Filed on 10/26/2022) |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. against CloudFlare, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number ACANDC-17669467.). Filed by Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Tracy O. Appleton, #2 Exhibit Subpoena to Testify (Sable v. Cloudflare) 6.7.2022, #3 Exhibit 2022-07-22 Response to Cloudflare Subpoena - Signed, #4 Exhibit Cloudflare Subpoena TX served on RA 10.10.22, #5 Exhibit '932 Patent Disclaimer, #6 Exhibit IPR2021-00909 FD FINAL, #7 Declaration Declaration of Tamir Zegman, #8 Proposed Order, #9 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Ehrlich, Miles) (Filed on 10/26/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
