California Institute of Technology v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
California Institute of Technology |
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd |
Broadcom Corp. and Broadcom Inc. |
5:2022mc80318 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Susan van Keulen |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 Transcript of Proceedings held on 01/10/23, before Judge Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi. Court Reporter/Transcriber Echo Reporting, Inc., telephone number echoreporting@yahoo.com. Tape Number: FTR 10:57- 11:33. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re #22 Transcript Order, ) Redaction Request due 2/8/2023. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/21/2023. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/18/2023. (Related documents(s) #22 ) (Jauregui, Tara) (Filed on 1/18/2023) |
Filing 26 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 1/10/2023 before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi by Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc., for Court Reporter not listed - San Jose. (Dowd, James) (Filed on 1/17/2023) Transcriber - Tara Jauregui, email: echoreporting@yahoo.com Modified on 1/18/2023 (sp, COURT STAFF). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 23 Declaration of Amanda Swaim In Support of Caltech's Administrative Motion filed byBroadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc.. (Gooch, Joseph) (Filed on 1/11/2023) |
Filing 22 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 01/10/2023 before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi by California Institute of Technology, for Court Reporter not listed - San Jose. (Bhalla, Ravi) (Filed on 1/11/2023) Transcriber: Echo Reporting - Tara Jauregui Modified on 1/11/2023 (lmh, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi: Motion Hearing re #1 Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance filed by California Institute of Technology held on 1/10/2023.The Court heard oral argument and to issue the order.Movant's Attorney: Ravi Bhalla (Main Speaker), Kalpana Srinivasan. Respondent Broadcom's Attorney: James Dowd (Main Speaker), Taylor Gooch.Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. Appearance only: Michael Pearson. No Court Reporter. Digital Recording Liberty: 10:57-11:33a.m. Total time: 36 Minutes. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/10/2023) Modified on 1/10/2023 (amk, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE. The motion hearing as to #1 Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance against Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc. is set for 1/10/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. This is an in court proceeding and APPEARANCES SHALL BE MADE IN PERSON (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2023) Modified text on 1/9/2023 (amk, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 19 REPLY (re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance ) by Broadcom Corp. and Broadcom Inc. filed byCalifornia Institute of Technology. (Bhalla, Ravi) (Filed on 12/29/2022) |
Filing 18 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Unredacted Version of Plaintiff California Institute of Technology's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance by Broadcom Corp. and Broadcom Inc.)(Bhalla, Ravi) (Filed on 12/29/2022) |
Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance ) filed byBroadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jim Dowd in Support of Opposition, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14)(Dowd, James) (Filed on 12/19/2022) |
Filing 16 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amanda Swaim in Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Unredacted Version of Opposition to Motion to Enforce Subpoena, #4 Unredacted Version of Declaration of Jim Dowd in Support of Opposition, #5 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 1, #6 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 2, #7 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 4, #8 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 5, #9 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 6, #10 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 7, #11 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 8, #12 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 9, #13 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 11, #14 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 12, #15 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 13, #16 Unredacted Version of Exhibit 14)(Dowd, James) (Filed on 12/19/2022) |
![]() |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Daniel Selwyn (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance filed by Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc., California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Taylor Gooch)(Gooch, Joseph) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc. (Gooch, Joseph) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James M. Dowd (Dowd, James) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Taylor Gooch (Gooch, Joseph) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
![]() |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re-Setting Hearing re #1 Motion to Compel. Motion Hearing set for 1/3/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Opposition/Response due by 12/5/2022. Reply due by 12/12/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.), Set/Reset Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2022) |
Filing 7 Renotice motion hearing re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance by Broadcom Corp. and Broadcom Inc. filed byCalifornia Institute of Technology. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Srinivasan, Kalpana) (Filed on 11/28/2022) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by California Institute of Technology (Srinivasan, Kalpana) (Filed on 11/28/2022) |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice By Ravi Bhalla ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17751956.) filed by California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Bhalla, Ravi) (Filed on 11/22/2022) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022) |
Filing 1 MOTION TO COMPEL Subpoena Compliance against Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Inc. ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number 17747484.). Filed by California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ravi Bhalla In Support of Motion to Compel, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel)(Srinivasan, Kalpana) (Filed on 11/21/2022) Modified on 11/25/2022 (ecg, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.