Van Meter Inc. v. Innovative Solar Inc,
| Van Meter Inc. |
| Innovative Solar Inc, |
| 5:2022mc80323 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Writ of Execution Issued in the amount of $1,378,278.80 as to Innovative Solar Inc. (San Francisco County) (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Proposed Writ does not specify the county. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #12 Application for Writ filed by Van Meter Inc . (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION for Writ of Execution by Van Meter Inc.. (Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 1/20/2023) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for Writ of Execution by Van Meter Inc.. (Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 1/20/2023) |
| Filing 10 Writ of Execution Issued in the amount of $1,378,278.80 as to Innovative Solar Inc. (Alameda County) (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2022) Modified on 12/5/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 Writ of Execution Issued in the amount of $1,378,278.80 as to Innovative Solar Inc. (Los Angeles County) (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2022) Modified on 12/5/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 Writ of Execution Issued in the amount of $1,378,278.80 as to Innovative Solar Inc. (Santa Clara County) (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2022) |
| Filing 7 ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in the amount of $1,378,278.80 against Innovative Solar Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2022) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Abstract of Judgment re #1 Registration of Judgment, by Van Meter Inc.. (Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 12/2/2022) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Writ of Execution by Van Meter Inc.. (Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 12/2/2022) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Writ of Execution by Van Meter Inc.. (Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 12/2/2022) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Writ of Execution by Van Meter Inc.. (Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 12/2/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2022) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT AGAINST INNOVATIVE SOLAR INC. against Van Meter Inc. ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number ACANDC-17766380.). Filed by Van Meter Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certified Judgment in a Civil Action)(Elliott, Kevin) (Filed on 11/29/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Van Meter Inc. v. Innovative Solar Inc, | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Van Meter Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Robert Elliott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Innovative Solar Inc, | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
