Williams v. Superior Court of Sacramento County
Anthony James Williams |
Superior Court of Sacramento County |
5:2023cv00305 |
January 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC JNE |
Susan van Keulen |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: Copies of #8 Letter, #9 Motion, #10 Consent/Declination emailed to CAED. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2023) Modified on 2/2/2023 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Anthony James Williams. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2023) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony James Williams. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2023) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2023: #1 Envelope) (jlg, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 Letter from Anthony James Williams. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2023) |
Filing 7 Remark: Case transferred from California Northern has been opened in Eastern District of California - Live System as case 2:23-cv-00196, filed 01/31/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2023) |
Filing 6 Remark: Case sent to ECFhelpdesk for transfer to ED/CA (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 1/30/23. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 3/2/2023. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 Declaration of Indigency and REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel filed by Anthony James Williams. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee not paid). Filed by Anthony James Williams. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023) |
Copy of #3 Clerk's Notice and #4 Notice of Assignment mailed to petitioner. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Superior Court of Sacramento County | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Anthony James Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Superior Court of Sacramento County | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.