POPA v. APPLE INC.,
Plaintiff: ASHLEY POPA
Defendant: Apple Inc
Case Number: 5:2023cv00548
Filed: February 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Edward J Davila
2 Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING *AS MODIFIED* 59 STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/24/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2023)
March 9, 2023 Filing 31 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward J. Davila: Status Conference held on 3/9/2023. Parties to confer re consolidation and leadership motions. Court will not disturb motion hearing date of June 1, 2023. Defendant Apple is relieved from its obligations to respond to individual complaints.Further Status Conference set for 4/27/2023 at 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Joint Status Report due by 3:00 PM on 4/20/2023.Plaintiffs Attorneys: Timothy Fisher, Tina Wolfson, Stephen Basser, Adam Pollock, Gary Lynch, Jae Kim, Gayle Blatt, John Yanchunis, Ryan McGee, Paul Whalen, Jeff Westerman, Charles Schaffer, Jason Rathod. Defendant Attorneys: Emily Henn, Kathryn Cahoy, Amy Heath. Total Time in Court: 20 min (11:07-11:27 AM). Court Reporter: Irene Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Granting #25 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Hannah Barnett. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/9/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting #24 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Elizabeth Pollock-Avery. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/9/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting #23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Gary Lynch. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/9/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 27 *Filed in Error - See ECF No. #29 * ORDER Granting #24 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Elizabeth Pollock-Avery. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/9/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023) Modified on 3/9/2023 (crr, COURT STAFF).
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 26 *Filed in Error - See ECF No. #28 * ORDER Granting #23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Gary Lynch. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/9/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023) Modified on 3/9/2023 (crr, COURT STAFF).
March 9, 2023 Filing 25 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18057185.) filed by ASHLEY POPA. (Barnett, Hannah) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18057172.) filed by ASHLEY POPA. (Pollock-Avery, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 9, 2023 Filing 23 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18057157.) filed by ASHLEY POPA. (Lynch, Gary) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
February 23, 2023 Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy S. Heath for Defendant Apple Inc. (Heath, Amy) (Filed on 2/23/2023)
February 23, 2023 Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Elizabeth Cahoy for Defendant Apple Inc. (Cahoy, Kathryn) (Filed on 2/23/2023)
February 23, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Johnson Henn for Defendant Apple Inc. (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 2/23/2023)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 2/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2023)
February 21, 2023 Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING. Status Conference set for 3/9/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2023)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER RELATING CASE. Related case: 5:22-cv-07069-EJD. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/21/2023. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2023)
February 15, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jae K. Kim (Kim, Jae) (Filed on 2/15/2023)
February 7, 2023 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/21/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms.(shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2023)
February 7, 2023 Filing 14 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/5/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/12/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2023)
February 7, 2023 Filing 13 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Western; Case Number 2:23-cv-00095. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 joint Motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). The parties request that this case be transferred to the Northern District of California (San Jose Div.). In light of the parties' agreements, there is no dispute that venue, personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction are proper in that District. Nor do there appear exceptional or extraordinary circumstances warranting a denial of the Motion. Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. #10 ) is GRANTED, and the case is TRANSFERRED FORTHWITH to the Northern District of California, San Jose Division. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/3/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly)
February 3, 2023 Case electronically transferred to District of Northern District of California. (elt)
February 2, 2023 Filing 11 BRIEF in Support re #10 Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed by APPLE INC.. (Raiola, Stephen)
February 2, 2023 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by APPLE INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Raiola, Stephen)
February 2, 2023 Filing 9 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by APPLE INC. Answer due from APPLE INC. on 3/31/2023. (Raiola, Stephen)
February 2, 2023 Filing 8 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by APPLE INC.. (Raiola, Stephen)
February 2, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Francis Raiola on behalf of APPLE INC.. (Raiola, Stephen)
February 2, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ASHLEY POPA. APPLE INC. served on 1/24/2023, answer due 2/14/2023. (Lynch, Gary)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/25/2023. (kly)
January 24, 2023 Judge Cathy Bissoon presiding. (ctb)
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER OF RECUSAL. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a), this Court hereby recuses itself as to all matters of the above-captioned case and requests that this case be assigned to another member of the Court. Judge Arthur J. Schwab recused. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 1/23/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (lar)
January 23, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to APPLE INC. (elt)
January 18, 2023 Filing 2 Errata re #1 Complaint against APPLE INC. by ASHLEY POPA. Reason for Correction: Incorrect document filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt)
January 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7494507), filed by RODNEY MENEELY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) Modified text on 1/23/2023. See Errata (elt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POPA v. APPLE INC.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASHLEY POPA
Represented By: Gary F Lynch
Represented By: Elizabeth L Pollock-Avery
Represented By: Hannah N Barnett
Represented By: Jae K. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc
Represented By: Stephen Francis Raiola
Represented By: Amy S. Heath
Represented By: Emily Johnson Henn
Represented By: Kathryn Elizabeth Cahoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?