Grewal v. City Of Palo Alto et al
| harlene Kaur grewal |
| City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Palo Alto Police Department and Ian Johnson |
| 5:2023cv00802 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING 5/23/23 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNENCE TO 6/13/23. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/23/2023 is continued to 6/13/2023 09:30 AM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Case Management Statement due by 6/6/2023. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/svk General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by harlene Kaur grewal. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2023) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via email.) Consent/Declination due by 3/24/2023. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department Notice of Appearance of Stephanie Davin (Davin, Stephanie) (Filed on 3/9/2023) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department Answer and Consent to Magistrate (Davin, Stephanie) (Filed on 3/9/2023) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Davin for Defendants (Davin, Stephanie) (Filed on 3/7/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department.. (Heaberlin, Jon) (Filed on 3/2/2023) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines and other Court requested Documents (Heaberlin, Jon) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 6 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byCity Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department. (Heaberlin, Jon) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department re #1 Notice of Removal, Mail and Electronic Certificates (Heaberlin, Jon) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by City Of Palo Alto, Nick Enberg, Ian Johnson, Palo Alto Police Department re #1 Notice of Removal, (Heaberlin, Jon) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The Correct event is Certificate/Proof of Service. The correct event can be found at: Civil Events > Initial Pleadings and Service > Service of Process > Certificate/Proof of Service. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #4 Notice (Other) filed by City Of Palo Alto, Ian Johnson, Nick Enberg, Palo Alto Police Department (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/16/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/23/2023 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/9/2023. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara with jury demand. Their case number is 22CV407190. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18013193). Filed by Palo Alto Police Department, Nick Enberg, City Of Palo Alto, Ian Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Heaberlin, Jon) (Filed on 2/22/2023) Modified on 2/23/2023 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
