Sylabs, Inc. v. Rose et al
| Sylabs, Inc. |
| Gregory Rose, Julia Rose, Gregory M. Kurtzer, Julia Kurtzer, Robert Adolph, Matthew Hayden, Erin Fong, CTRL IQ, Inc. doing business as CIQ, Open Drives, Inc., David Buss, Marlin Prager, Joel Whitley and IAG Capital Partners |
| 5:2023cv00849 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 13
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 12
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 11
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 10
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 8
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 7
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 6
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons. (Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/23/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/30/2023 09:30 AM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/10/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Violation of Defend Trade Secrets Act; Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; Violation of California Uniform Trade Secrets Act; Violation of Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. 1962(c); Violation Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. 1962(d); Civil Conspiracy; Violation of California Unfair Trade Practices Act, Cal. Bus & Prof. Code 17200; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Aiding & Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Unjust Enrichment; Conversion. against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18019660.). Filed bySylabs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lepiscopo, Peter) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. Parties' names should be entered the way they're named in the Complaint. For example, Joel Whitley should be entered with 'Whitley' entered in the last name field and 'Joel' in the first name field and not as 'XXX-XX-6018 Whitley'. DBA should be entered as an alias and not as part of the name. Parties' names should also not be entered in the 'party text' field nor should they be entered in all capital letters. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Sylabs, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
