Swarts v. The Home Depot, Inc.
| Jason Swarts |
| The Home Depot, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv00995 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF: (1) THE WIRETAP ACT, 18 U.S.C. 2510 et. seq.; (2) CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 631; (3) CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 632; AND (4) CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE 17200, et seq. against The Home Depot, Inc.. Filed by Jason Swarts. (Straub,Craig) (Filed on 4/25/2023) Modified on 4/26/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO BRIEF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #15 Stipulation. Replies due by 5/26/2023. Responses due by 4/26/2023.(mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2023)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #14 MOTION to Dismiss The Complaint filed by Jason Swarts. (Straub, Craig) (Filed on 3/28/2023) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss The Complaint filed by The Home Depot, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 6/22/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 4/7/2023. Replies due by 4/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/24/2023) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 6/20/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/27/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at JSTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than June 26, 2023 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 6/20/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/27/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2023) |
| Filing 12 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanal M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 3/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2023) |
| Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2023) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND WILL BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jason Swarts.. (Straub, Craig) (Filed on 3/16/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by The Home Depot, Inc... (Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/15/2023) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending the Deadline for Defendant's Answer to The Complaint filed by The Home Depot, Inc.. (Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/7/2023) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by The Home Depot, Inc. re 4 Case Assigned by Intake,, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines (Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/6/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/31/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/20/2023. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by The Home Depot, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. for The Home Depot, Inc.. (Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/3/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by The Home Depot, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. for The Home Depot, Inc.. (Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/3/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 23CV410599. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18043632). Filed byThe Home Depot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Superior Court Filings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of C. Sultan, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Voigts, Anne) (Filed on 3/3/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Swarts v. The Home Depot, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jason Swarts | |
| Represented By: | Michael R Crosner |
| Represented By: | Chad A. Saunders |
| Represented By: | Craig Wallace Straub |
| Represented By: | Zachary Miles Crosner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Home Depot, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Anne Margaret Voigts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
