Guancione v. Espinosa
| Rosalie Guancione |
| Jaime Espinosa |
| 5:2023cv01935 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byJaime Espinosa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Decision in Guancione v. Guevara)(Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 6/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and to Dissolve TRO ) filed byJaime Espinosa. (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/19/2023)
|
|
Filing 21
OMNIBUS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND REMAND (re #18 MOTION to Remand, #19 MOTION to Remand, #15 MOTION to Strike #1 Notice of Removal, #14 MOTION to Remand ) filed by Jaime Espinosa. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adrienne Zack, #2 Exhibit A- State Court Conformed Copy)(Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/17/2023) Modified on 5/18/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 20
OBJECTIONS to re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and to Dissolve TRO by Rosalie Guancione. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023)
|
|
Filing 19
Second Amended MOTION to Remand Plaintiff's State Court Complaint for Elder Abuse Restraining Order filed by Rosalie Guancione. Responses due by 5/23/2023. Replies due by 5/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service) (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2023)
|
|
Filing 18
FIRST AMENDED MOTION to Remand filed by Rosalie Guancione. Responses due by 5/22/2023. Replies due by 5/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2023) Modified on 5/10/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF). Modified on 5/10/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 17
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jaime Espinosa re #1 Notice of Removal (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 5/5/2023)
|
|
Filing 16
Proposed Order re #15 MOTION to Strike #1 Removal, #14 MOTION to Remand by Rosalie Guancione. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2023)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Strike #1 Removal filed by Rosalie Guancione. Responses due by 5/17/2023. Replies due by 5/24/2023. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2023)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Remand filed by Rosalie Guancione. Responses due by 5/17/2023. Replies due by 5/24/2023. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2023)
|
|
Filing 12
CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 9/14/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/21/2023 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 1, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and to Dissolve TRO filed by Jaime Espinosa. Motion Hearing set for 9/21/2023 09:00 AM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Responses due by 5/12/2023. Replies due by 5/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 4/28/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DECLINING TO RELATE CASES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/26/2023. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 4/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 13
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Address Update by Rosalie Guancione (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2023)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/26/2023. Case C-23-1935-VKD is NOT related to case C-18-4788-PJH. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jaime Espinosa re #1 Notice of Removal (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 4/26/2023)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rosalie Guancione. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/9/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jaime Espinosa re #1 Notice of Removal (Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 4/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 23EA000028. (). Filed byJaime Espinosa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zack, Adrienne) (Filed on 4/21/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guancione v. Espinosa | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosalie Guancione | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jaime Espinosa | |
| Represented By: | Adrienne Zack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
