Conru v. Buckheit
| Andrew Conru |
| Jonathan B. Buckheit |
| 5:2023cv04056 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Jack Russo for Defendant (Russo, Jack) (Filed on 8/24/2023)
|
|
Filing 13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Andrew Conru of J. Buckheit (Vink, Paul) (Filed on 8/22/2023)
|
|
Filing 12
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Andrew Conru. Service waived by Jonathan B. Buckheit waiver sent on 8/21/2023, answer due 10/20/2023. (Vink, Paul) (Filed on 8/22/2023)
|
|
Filing 11
CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2024 11:00 AM before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2023)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 8/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2023)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew Conru.. (Masserman, Dean) (Filed on 8/14/2023)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Seema R Shah Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff (Shah, Seema) (Filed on 8/11/2023)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Paul D Vink Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff (Vink, Paul) (Filed on 8/11/2023)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Jonathan B. Buckheit. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/7/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/14/2023 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons. (Masserman, Dean) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/24/2023. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Decl. Relief & Breach of Contract against Jonathan B. Buckheit ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18533529.). Filed byAndrew Conru. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Call Option Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Purchase Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - 1st Amendment to Stockholder Agr., #4 Exhibit D - Note Purchase & Sale Agr., #5 Exhibit E - 2nd Amendment to Stockholder Agr., #6 Exhibit F - Call Exercise Notice Letter, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet)(Masserman, Dean) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conru v. Buckheit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew Conru | |
| Represented By: | Seema R Shah |
| Represented By: | Paul D Vink |
| Represented By: | Dean E. Masserman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jonathan B. Buckheit | |
| Represented By: | Jack Russo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
