Enovsys LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Enovsys LLC
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2023cv04549
Filed: September 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward J Davila
Referring Judge: Virginia K DeMarchi
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Filing 29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 2/1/2024 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Responses due by 11/15/2023. Replies due by 11/22/2023. (Chen, Reuben) (Filed on 11/1/2023)
October 27, 2023 Filing 28 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Enovsys LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Case Schedule)(Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/27/2023)
October 27, 2023 Filing 27 Certificate of Interested Entities by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Keefe, Heidi) (Filed on 10/27/2023)
October 27, 2023 Filing 26 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Attachments: #1 Signature Attestation)(Keefe, Heidi) (Filed on 10/27/2023)
October 24, 2023 Filing 25 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Chen, Reuben) (Filed on 10/24/2023)
October 16, 2023 Filing 24 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff Enovsys LLC (Attachments: #1 Signature Attestation for Party's Conformed Signature)(Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/16/2023)
October 10, 2023 Filing 23 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Chen, Reuben) (Filed on 10/10/2023)
September 27, 2023 Filing 22 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/9/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/27/2023. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/davila-edward-j-ejd/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2023)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 9/27/2026. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Mathew Pivovar as Counsel for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (Pivovar, Adam) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela Madrigal as counsel for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (Madrigal, Angela) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Uber Technologies, Inc... (Keefe, Heidi) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 16 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Keefe, Heidi) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Heidi Lyn Keefe as Counsel for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. Te (Keefe, Heidi) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandra Marie Stenstedt Leeper on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc. (Leeper, Alexandra) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Reuben H. Chen on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc. (Chen, Reuben) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 18, 2023 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Enovsys LLC.. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/18/2023)
September 18, 2023 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Enovsys LLC. Uber Technologies, Inc. served on 9/15/2023, answer due 10/6/2023. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/18/2023) Modified on 9/19/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
September 6, 2023 Filing 10 ERRATA re #1 Complaint, Corrected Exhibits A-C to the Complaint for Patent Infringement against Uber Technologies, Inc., by Enovsys LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit [Corrected] Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit [Corrected] Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit [Corrected] Exhibit C)(Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/28/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/5/2023 01:30 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/20/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley Hugh Thompson, Jr (Thompson, Stanley) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sandeep Seth (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Enovsys LLC (Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,441,752; 6,756,918; and 7,199,726 (cc: form mailed to register). (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18614381) against Uber Technologies, Inc.. Filed byEnovsys LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 9/5/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Enovsys LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Enovsys LLC
Represented By: Stanley Hugh Thompson, Jr.
Represented By: Sandeep Seth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Heidi Lyn Keefe
Represented By: Reuben H. Chen
Represented By: Adam Mathew Pivovar
Represented By: Alexandra Marie Stenstedt Leeper
Represented By: Angela Madrigal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?