Allen et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Ashlyn Allen and Phillip Allen
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 5:2023cv04555
Filed: September 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Referring Judge: P Casey Pitts
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2023 Filing 13 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Ashlyn Allen. (LaRocque, Elizabeth) (Filed on 11/21/2023)
November 20, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION to Enforce Judgment filed by Ashlyn Allen, Phillip Allen. Responses due by 12/4/2023. Replies due by 12/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT) Exhibit 36 (Carvalho, Tionna) (Filed on 11/20/2023)
October 12, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher James Campbell (Campbell, Christopher) (Filed on 10/12/2023)
September 12, 2023 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 11/22/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge P. Casey Pitts in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (nmc, COURT USER) (Filed on 9/12/2023)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge P. Casey Pitts for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case, except for discovery purposes. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2023)
September 7, 2023 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 6, 2023 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/20/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 5, 2023 Answer to Removal Complaint Document 1-10. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Answer to Removal Complaint Document 1-10 by Ford Motor Company. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Peter Hugret (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Pollard Vilchez (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Vilchez, Katherine) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Trina Marie Clayton (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation (parent of State Street Bank and Trust Company, which is the trustee of the Ford defined contribution plans), Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc. and certain affiliates, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group and certain affiliates, Other Affiliate Evercore Trust Company, N.A. (fiduciary of the Ford defined contribution plans) for Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Cruz Superior Court of California. Their case number is 22CV02606. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18615124). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Attorney ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T1, #22 Exhibit T2, #23 Exhibit U, #24 Exhibit V, #25 Exhibit W, #26 Exhibit X, #27 Exhibit Y, #28 Exhibit Z, #29 Exhibit AA, #30 Exhibit BB, #31 Exhibit CC, #32 Exhibit DD, #33 Exhibit EE, #34 Exhibit FF, #35 Exhibit GG, #36 Exhibit HH, #37 Exhibit II, #38 Exhibit JJ, #39 Exhibit KK, #40 Exhibit LL, #41 Exhibit MM, #42 Exhibit NN, #43 Exhibit OO, #44 Exhibit PP, #45 Exhibit QQ, #46 Exhibit RR, #47 Exhibit SS, #48 Civil Cover Sheet, #49 Certificate of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 9/5/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashlyn Allen
Represented By: Tionna Dolin
Represented By: Daniel A. Law
Represented By: Christopher James Campbell
Represented By: Tionna Carvalho
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann LaRocque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Allen
Represented By: Tionna Dolin
Represented By: Mark Gibson
Represented By: Christopher James Campbell
Represented By: Tionna Carvalho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Katherine Pollard Vilchez
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Trina Marie Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?