Smith v. Quezada et al
Deandre Smith |
Rebecca Quezada, Kyle Hara and Aleksei Rajamachvili |
5:2023cv05615 |
November 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
PSLC HHL |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Deandre Smith. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2023) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Deandre Smith.. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2023) |
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 12/8/2023. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kyle Hara, Rebecca Quezada, Aleksei Rajamachvili. Filed by Deandre Smith. Consent/Declination due by 11/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.