Vines v. Hixon et al
Petitioner: Roosevelt Vines
Respondent: Acting Warden Kevin Hixon and People of the State of California
Case Number: 5:2023cv05765
Filed: November 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #4 Motion to Set Aside Dkt. 2 . Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on November 28, 2023. (svklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023)
November 27, 2023 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Roosevelt Vines.. (Beles, Robert) (Filed on 11/27/2023)
November 27, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION set aside clerk's docket order re summons filed by Roosevelt Vines. Responses due by 12/11/2023. Replies due by 12/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beles, Robert) (Filed on 11/27/2023)
November 27, 2023 Filing 3 2ND CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/11/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2023)
November 9, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/24/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2023)
November 8, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number ACANDC-18820806.). Filed by Roosevelt Vines. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Beles, Robert) (Filed on 11/8/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vines v. Hixon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roosevelt Vines
Represented By: Robert Joseph Beles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Acting Warden Kevin Hixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?