Nguyen v. The United States
| Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen |
| The United States |
| 5:2023cv06047 |
| November 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen. The United States served on 12/22/2023, answer due 2/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to The United States. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2023)
|
|
Filing 8
Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 511019109. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023)
|
|
Filing 7
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against The United States. Filed by Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2023)
|
|
Remark: Filed copy of Order #6 was mailed via USPS to Pro Se Plaintiff at address on record AND emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff at furlycustomerservice@yahoo.com. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2023)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Provisionally Denying #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Screening #1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 12/4/2023. (vkdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2024 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Change of Address by Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against The United States (Filing fee $ 402.). Filed by Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nguyen v. The United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The United States | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
