Wescott v. Apple Inc
Carl A. Wescott |
Apple Inc |
5:2023cv06254 |
December 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Other Statutory Actions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Carl A. Wescott (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2024) |
Filing 7 Response to Order to Show Cause #6 Order to Show Cause, by Carl A. Wescott. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2024) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute and to Comply with Court Order. Plaintiff's Show Cause Response due by 1/22/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 1/8/2024. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Consent/Declination due by 1/4/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Staying Order of Service; and Screening Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Amended complaint due by 1/5/2024. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/27/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/5/2024 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Carl A. Wescott. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple Inc. Filed by Carl A. Wescott. Consent/Declination due by 12/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wescott v. Apple Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carl A. Wescott | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Apple Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.