Khanali v. Mayorkas et al
| Shabnam Khanali |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted Kim, Sue Raufer, Danielle Lehman and Christopher A Wray |
| 5:2024cv00392 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian S. Lam for Defendants (Lam, Ian) (Filed on 3/19/2024) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted Kim, Danielle Lehman, Alejandro Mayorkas, Sue Raufer, Christopher A Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2024) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 2/1/2024) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 2/1/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. The proposed summons must match the docket exactly. You have the first initial for Ms. Lehman on the summons but her full name on the docket. Please correct the names to match the docket exactly and refile the proposed summons. Re: #7 Proposed Summons filed by Shabnam Khanali (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2024) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 1/31/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. The proposed summons must match the docket exactly. Please correct the names to match the docket exactly and refile the proposed summons. Re: #6 Proposed Summons filed by Shabnam Khanali (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2024) |
| Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/7/2024. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Shabnam Khanali. Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint Under the APA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Michael) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Shabnam Khanali.. (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 1/23/2024) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint Under the APA (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19049924). Filed by Shabnam Khanali. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Michael) (Filed on 1/23/2024) Modified on 1/24/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. [err201] Attachment 1 has been provisionally sealed due to personal identifiers. Please follow up with a motion to seal or remove document. Additionally, Section IX. DIVISIONAL ASSIGNMENT on the Civil Cover Sheet is incomplete. Please re-file in its entirety Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Shabnam Khanali. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
