Hoffman v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
| Kristin Hoffman |
| United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States National Institute of Health and United States Patent and Trademark Office |
| 5:2024cv00623 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kristin Hoffman.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2024) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kristin Hoffman. United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention served on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024; United States Department of Health and Human Services served on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024; United States Food and Drug Administration served on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024; United States National Institute of Health served on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024; United States Patent and Trademark Office served on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service) #6 Certificate/Proof of Service) (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 2/28/2024 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 2ND CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/5/2024. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/30/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/7/2024 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States National Institute of Health, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States National Institute of Health, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Filing fee $ 405., Receipt # 511019128). Filed by Kristin Hoffman. Consent/Declination due by 2/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-J, #2 Exhibits K-Z, #3 Exhibits A2-M2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Receipt) ***SEALED EXHIBITS CONTAIN PERSONAL INFORMATION***(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
