Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Jackson
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Case Number: 5:2024cv00812
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia K DeMarchi
Referring Judge: P Casey Pitts
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2024 Filing 18 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF COMPLAINT filed by LinkedIn Corporation and Jacqueline Jackson. (Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 3/1/2024) Modified on 3/4/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF).
March 1, 2024 Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LinkedIn Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Microsoft Corporation for LinkedIn Corporation. (Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 3/1/2024)
March 1, 2024 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia Irwin for Defendant LinkedIn Corporation (Irwin, Julia) (Filed on 3/1/2024)
March 1, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Aarti G. Reddy for Defendant LinkedIn Corporation (Reddy, Aarti) (Filed on 3/1/2024)
March 1, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Gutkin for Defendant LinkedIn Corporation (Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 3/1/2024)
March 1, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Dean Brown for Defendant LinkedIn Corporation (Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 3/1/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacqueline Jackson. LinkedIn Corporation served on 2/15/2024, answer due 3/7/2024. (Tellis, Roland) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 14, 2024 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/16/2024 at 01:00 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (nmc, COURT USER) (Filed on 2/14/2024)
February 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge P. Casey Pitts for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral Judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2024)
February 13, 2024 Filing 9 ***DISREGARD DUPLICATE FILING *** CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2024) Modified on 2/14/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF).
February 13, 2024 Filing 8 ***DISREGARD DUPLICATE FILING *** CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2024) Modified on 2/14/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF).
February 13, 2024 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2024)
February 13, 2024 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jacqueline Jackson.. (Tellis, Roland) (Filed on 2/13/2024)
February 12, 2024 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/7/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/14/2024 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (kmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2024)
February 12, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to LinkedIn Corporation. (kmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2024)
February 12, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. (wsm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2024)
February 9, 2024 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Tellis, Roland) (Filed on 2/9/2024)
February 9, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against LinkedIn Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19113218.). Filed by Jacqueline Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tellis, Roland) (Filed on 2/9/2024) Modified on 2/12/2024 (kmm2, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Jackson
Represented By: Roland Tellis
Represented By: Michael Joseph Pacelli
Represented By: Sterling Lynn Cluff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey Gutkin
Represented By: Aarti G. Reddy
Represented By: Julia Irwin
Represented By: Matthew Dean Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?