Chithira v. Hodges et al
Plaintiff: Ashik Vetrivelu Chithira
Defendant: Christopher W Hodges, Patricia A. Lacina and Antony Blinken
Case Number: 5:2024cv01871
Filed: March 27, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ashik Vetrivelu Chithira (Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 4/2/2024)
March 28, 2024 Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024)
March 28, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Christopher W Hodges, Patricia A. Lacina, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024)
March 27, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/10/2024. (wsm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)
March 27, 2024 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 3/27/2024)
March 27, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19262262). Filed by Ashik Vetrivelu Chithira. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldstein, Joshua) (Filed on 3/27/2024)
March 27, 2024 INTAKE CALLED FILER RE: VENUE; ATTORNEY WILL CHECK AND CALL INTAKE BACK (wsm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chithira v. Hodges et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashik Vetrivelu Chithira
Represented By: Joshua L. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher W Hodges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia A. Lacina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?