Pugh v. Arredondo et al
| Darryl Pugh |
| S. Arredondo, Aceves, N. Cardenas, Mendez and Rob Bonta |
| 5:2024cv01890 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| PSLC HHL |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to a United States Magistrate Judge. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served via email. (NEF) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 5/6/2024. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served via email (NEF) |
| Filing 1 CLERKS NOTICE: The filer failed to submit this S.1983 complaint through the email procedures required by General Order No. 76. If the filer does not, by the deadline below, either resubmit the documents through the email procedures or file a motion seeking permission to file the complaint by mail, this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Email resubmission deadline: 4/10/2024 (Attachments: #1 Lodged Complaint, #2 Envelope) (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served via email (NEF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
