Patel v. The United States et al
Raj K. Patel |
The United States and Leland Stanford Junior University |
5:2024cv02140 |
April 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Susan van Keulen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2024 09:30 PM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Service by The Clerk filed by Raj K. Patel. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Raj K. Patel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Raj K. Patel. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stanford Junior University, The United States. Filed by Raj K. Patel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.