Lockett v. Matteson
Jamie Lockett |
Giselle Matteson |
3:2024cv02189 |
April 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Alex G Tse |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jamie Lockett.. (McComas, Brian) (Filed on 5/22/2024) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PETITIONER Re: Consent or Declination. Petitioner shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 5/30/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2024) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/7/2024. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2024) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. The correct event is 'Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis'. [err101]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #2 MOTION filed by Jamie Lockett. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2024) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Stay THE PROCEEDING PENDING EXHAUSTION OF COLORABLE CLAIMS; SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Jamie Lockett. Responses due by 4/26/2024. Replies due by 5/3/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F)(McComas, Brian) (Filed on 4/12/2024) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis by Jamie Lockett. (McComas, Brian) (Filed on 4/12/2024) Modified on 4/23/2024 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Filed by Jamie Lockett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-G)(McComas, Brian) (Filed on 4/12/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lockett v. Matteson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jamie Lockett | |
Represented By: | Brian Curtis McComas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Giselle Matteson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.