Gomez v. Omnicell, Inc. et al
Luis Gomez |
Omnicell, Inc. and Johnson Service Group |
5:2024cv02205 |
April 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Beth Labson Freeman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING RESETTING DATES AND DEADLINES. Status Report due by 6/5/2025. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2024) |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING WITH MODIFICATIONS #14 STIPULATION STAYING CASE PENDING ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/5/24. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2024) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Staying Entire Action Pending Arbitration filed by Johnson Service Group. (Chang, Chloe) (Filed on 6/4/2024) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 9/12/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/19/2024 11:00 AM before Beth Labson Freeman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2024) |
Filing 12 Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins for all further proceedings. Judge Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras., ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins for all further proceedings. Judge Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(smc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2024) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND WILL BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2024) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Johnson Service Group.. (Chang, Chloe) (Filed on 4/29/2024) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Luis Gomez.. (Shkodnik, Roman) (Filed on 4/29/2024) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by Luis Gomez (Shkodnik, Roman) (Filed on 4/29/2024) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Omnicell, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group, Inc., Corporate Parent BlackRock, Inc. for Omnicell, Inc.. and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Cook, Collin) (Filed on 4/15/2024) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Collin Dennis Cook for Defendant Omnicell, Inc. (Cook, Collin) (Filed on 4/15/2024) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/10/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2024 10:00 AM in San Jose, - Teleconference Only. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2024) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/29/2024. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2024) |
Answer to Removal Complaint (Removal #1 Exhibit B) by Johnson Service Group. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2024) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Johnson Service Group re #1 Notice of Removal, of Related Cases Pursuant to Local Rule 3-13 (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 4/12/2024) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Johnson Service Group re #1 Notice of Removal, (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 4/12/2024) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 24CV432995. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19317162). Filed by Johnson Service Group. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ryan H. Crosner ISO, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Ryan H. Crosner, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Ryan H. Crosner, #4 Declaration of James E. Filarski ISO, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 4/12/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.